The project addresses a relevant market (AI product photography) but the submission lacks credibility due to hyperbolic, unverifiable claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product'). Search analysis reveals no significant digital footprint for 'zust.ai', contradicting the reach claims. The submission quality is poor, with missing data and vague technical details, resulting in a score reflecting a lack of verifiable existence or traction.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline