The submission for 'Zoa' lacks verifiable evidence and contains contradictory and hyperbolic claims. While the domain 'zoa.io' exists, there is no public footprint, product, or service associated with it that supports the claim that 'most people have used' it. The description of a 'sole proprietorship' conflicts with a claimed team size of 30. With no actionable utility, verifiable reach, or clear technical description, the project scores exceptionally low on the Proof of Usefulness scale.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline