ZIBRIO represents a legitimate health-tech product with high real-world utility for fall prevention in older adults. However, the submission itself is poor, containing hyperbolic claims ('most people have used my product') and missing financial data. While the technology and problem-solution fit are strong (backed by external verification of Zibrio's CES awards and NIH funding), the PoU score is penalized significantly due to the inaccuracy of the reach claims and the low quality of the provided evidence. The score reflects a 'Small but promising' venture comparable to the lower end of established scale due to its niche hardware nature.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline