The submission for 'Zevamp' (project 'GoldenWalker') lacks verifiable evidence and contains significant red flags. While the domain zevamp.com exists as a small content/design agency, the claim that 'most people have used my product' is demonstrably false given the lack of online footprint. The target audience of 'everyone' is unrealistic, and the 'null' revenue combined with a lack of descriptive detail results in a near-zero score. The project appears to be either a test submission or a very early-stage concept with high-level hallucinations regarding its current traction.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline