The submission represents a software development agency (Zethic) rather than a specific product with verifiable metrics. The claim that 'most people have used my product' appears to be significant hyperbole or a reference to client work (e.g., Dunzo) without distinguishing ownership. The submission lacks concrete data on revenue, active users, or specific product features. The response quality is low, with missing fields and vague target audience definitions ('everyone'). While the company likely provides valid services, the PoU score is heavily penalized for lack of evidence and hyperbolic claims.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline