Zenna presents a high-potential concept in the AI-wellness space but suffers from a critically low-quality submission. While the problem (migraine relief) is genuine, the claims regarding audience reach ('everyone') and traction ('most people have used my product') are demonstrably false or hyperbolic. The technical section lists only 'Internet' despite claims of advanced brainwave algorithms, and the team size of 30 contradicts the lack of verifiable footprint. The project scores poorly due to lack of evidence, vague assertions, and red flags in the traction data.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline