The submission describes a niche B2B healthcare consultancy but contradicts itself by claiming the audience is 'everyone' and that 'most people have used [the] product.' These exaggerated claims, combined with the misuse of financial terms ('marketcap' instead of revenue) and lack of verifiable technical innovation, result in a very low score. While the underlying service may have utility, the submission fails to provide credible evidence of traction or scalable impact.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline