The submission lacks a project description and contains unverifiable, exaggerated claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product'). Search results yield no evidence of the project's existence or the claimed 'Education Management' platform. The revenue field contains confusing text rather than data. Due to the lack of verifiable information and the presence of red flags regarding traction, the project scores near zero.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline