The submission represents a small IT services agency with significant discrepancies in its claims. While the project lists numerous technologies and services, the claim that 'most people have used my product' contradicts the stated client base of 'more than 10 business'. The audience reach is unrealistically defined as 'everyone', and the revenue metric is confused with 'marketcap'. With a launch date of 2015 and only 6 team members, the verifiable traction is minimal relative to the claims, resulting in a low score consistent with a small, local consultancy lacking distinct competitive differentiation or broad scale.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline