The project represents 'Yahoo', a legacy tech giant with massive historical reach and real-world utility. However, the submission itself is low-quality, likely unofficial (personal email, generic descriptions, missing metrics), and lacks verifiable internal data. While the entity's global scale guarantees high baseline scores for Utility and Reach, significant penalties (Qi=0.5) were applied to Traction and Innovation due to the lack of evidence and inaccurate tagging ('banking') in the submission. The score reflects a major brand weighed down by a poor proof-of-claim.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline