The submission presents a discrepancy between the project name 'SwiftWalker' and the description for 'Xpross Consulting'. While Xpross appears to be a legitimate, albeit niche, boutique consulting firm operating since 2013 with verifiable events (Silicon Valley CIO Summit), the submission quality is critically poor. Key fields contain nonsensical or false data (e.g., audience 'everyone', traction 'most people have used my product', revenue 'all time marketcap: 500000'). The score reflects the existence of the underlying business but is heavily penalized for the lack of accurate, verifiable data and the unprofessional nature of the submission.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline