The project represents a standard business consulting service rather than a technology platform. While the problem statement (technical founders lacking business acumen) is valid, the submission is undermined by hyperbolic and unverifiable claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', audience reach 'everyone'). The 'marketcap' metric is ambiguous and likely conflated with revenue or valuation. There is no evidence of technical innovation, as this is a service-based offering. The discrepancy between a 6-person team since 2018 and the lack of digital footprint or clear traction metrics results in a low score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline