The submission describes a legitimate-sounding digital health consultancy (XM Insights) but is heavily penalized for contradictory and inaccurate submission data. The project name 'LunarStorm' appears to be a user handle rather than the business name. Critical fields contain red flags: 'Audience Reach' claims 'everyone' (actual audience is niche NHS/B2B), and 'Evidence of Traction' claims 'most people have used my product', which is demonstrably false for a small consultancy. As a service-based business without listed proprietary technology, it scores low on technical innovation. The 'marketcap' revenue figure indicates confusion or potential crypto-token overlap not supported by the description.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline