The project represents a physical co-working space rather than a technology product. The submission contains hyperbolic and verifiable false claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product' and 'everyone' as the audience), which severely undermines credibility. While the service (office space) has inherent utility, the lack of technical innovation, ambiguous financial metrics ('marketcap: 2500000'), and poor response quality result in a very low score. The project appears to be a standard local SME with no significant digital or scalable differentiation.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline