The project represents a legitimate and established entity (South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - Xamk) with verifiable research utility in bioproducts and wood construction. However, the submission itself is of extremely low quality, containing hyperbolic and demonstrably false claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', 'audience reach: everyone'). While the underlying institution has significant traction, the 'Proof of Usefulness' relies on the evidence presented, which is weak and poorly articulated in this entry. The score reflects the high utility of the actual institution heavily penalized by the lack of credible specific data in the application.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline