While Wudpecker.io appears to be a functional AI sales/meeting assistant with valid market utility, the submission itself is of extremely low quality. Key claims such as 'everyone' for audience and 'most people have used my product' for traction are demonstrably false and unverifiable. The discrepancy between the project name 'Wudpecker' and the submitter name 'SilentFang', combined with zero concrete metrics, results in the minimum quality multipliers being applied. The project likely has higher real-world value than this score reflects, but the Proof of Usefulness methodology heavily penalizes unsupported and exaggerated submissions.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline