The project represents a legitimate and established organization (World Energy & Meteorology Council) based at the University of East Anglia, engaging in valuable climate-energy intersection work. However, the submission itself is of extremely low quality, featuring a mismatched submitter name ('ShadowHunter'), a likely temporary or student email address, and hallucinatory traction claims ('most people have used my product'). While the underlying entity has high real-world utility and market relevance, the 'Red Flag' nature of the submission details and lack of specific technical evidence significantly penalize the score, placing it in the range of small but verified initiatives rather than established tech leaders.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline