The submission describes the legitimate 'World Cities Culture Forum', a high-profile global network. However, the submission data contains severe red flags indicating it is likely spam or an automated entry. The traction claim ('most people have used my product') is factually false and generic. The revenue field cites 'marketcap', which is irrelevant to a non-profit policy forum. The submitter alias 'SilentClaw' further reduces credibility. While the underlying entity has high real-world utility, this specific submission fails to provide valid proof, resulting in a low score consistent with low-quality/spam entries.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline