The submission references a legitimate productivity tool (Workstreams.ai) but is filled with critical inaccuracies and unverifiable claims. While the URL points to a functional Slack/Microsoft Teams integration with real-world utility, the submission lists the project name as 'GoldenGale' (incorrect), claims a team size of 280 (LinkedIn data suggests ~20-50), and asserts 'most people have used my product' (factually false). The 'marketcap: null' revenue entry further indicates a low-effort or automated submission. The score reflects the actual utility of the underlying software, heavily penalized for the deceptive and low-quality submission data.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline