The project represents 'Workato', a widely recognized and high-value enterprise automation unicorn. However, the submission quality is exceptionally poor, containing vague exaggerations ('everyone', 'most people') and inaccurate financial data ($75M market cap vs multi-billion valuation). While the entity itself scores highly on utility and traction based on verifiable external data, the score is heavily penalized by the low quality of the submission inputs and the Quality Factors applied to unverified claims.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline