The submission presents significant credibility issues, most notably the traction claim that 'most people have used my product', which is factually impossible. The project describes itself as 'Legal-Tech' but lists only standard services with no evidence of proprietary technology. The financial metric provided ('marketcap: 2500000') is ambiguous (missing currency) and likely theoretical. With a claimed team of 30 but no verifiable digital footprint or realistic audience definition ('everyone'), the project scores poorly on traction and innovation.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline