The submission for Wild Lizard Web Design Limited suffers from extremely low response quality and hyperbolic claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', audience 'everyone') that severely damage credibility. While web design is a valid service, the project presents itself as a generic local agency with no distinguishable technical innovation ('Internet' listed as the only tech) or verifiable traction. Search results do not confirm a prominent brand by this name in the stated location, and the provided financial metric ('marketcap: 500000') is ambiguous and unsupported. The project scores very low due to lack of evidence, non-credible reach claims, and minimal specific utility described.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline