The submission contains significant red flags and verifiable falsehoods. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is objectively false for an obscure wildlife AI project. Listing 'leadership' as the sole technology indicates a lack of technical substance. No verifiable digital footprint exists for the project or its claimed 11-50 person team. The entry appears to be a test or low-quality submission.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline