The submission for 'We Are Optimists' (or 'SwiftShade') presents significant data quality issues and unsubstantiated claims. The project appears to be a venture portfolio or consulting entity, yet the name field references a specific product ('SwiftShade', likely an awning brand) and the description references psychology-driven venture building. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is demonstrably false and damages credibility. The financial metric provided ('all time marketcap: 500000') is non-standard and implies a very low valuation ($500k) for a project launched in 2013 with a team of 6. While the domain 'iamanoptimist.com' exists, the digital footprint is minimal (e.g., a YouTube channel with <1k views). The disparity between the 'everyone' audience claim and the niche/micro-scale reality results in a low score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline