The Washington Examiner is a well-established national media brand (est. 2006) with significant team size (350 employees) and verified reach, justifying a high baseline score comparable to other major media outlets. However, the submission itself is of low quality, featuring vague claims ('everyone', 'most people') and confused metrics ('marketcap' likely referring to revenue or views). Despite the poor entry data, the verifiable existence, scale, and utility of the platform drive the score into the 'Large Scale' category (400–700), adjusted downward for the lack of specific, verifiable evidence provided in the submission text.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline