The submission for WanderMeWell lacks credible detail and verifiable metrics. The claim that 'most people have used my product' contradicts the lack of public footprint and the generic technology description ('Internet'). The metric 'marketcap: 500000' is ambiguous (likely referencing valuation or a token rather than revenue) and unsupported. Without specific technical details, validated user data, or a functional description of the AI implementation, the project scores very low on the Proof of Usefulness scale, resembling a placeholder or low-effort entry.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline