The submission for Wally (wally.xyz) presents a crypto wallet SDK but suffers significantly from low-quality input data. The 'Evidence of Traction' claim ('most people have used my product') is demonstrably false and hyperbolic for a niche B2B tool. Additionally, the listed 'Business Type' ('Shoppable Videos') contradicts the project description, suggesting a copy-paste error or lack of seriousness. While the technical component (a wallet SDK) exists and has validity, the saturated market and poor submission quality result in a low score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline