The submission for WalliD presents a legitimate Web3 identity concept established in 2018, but the input data is critically flawed. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is demonstrably false and undermines credibility. The submission lacks concrete metrics, revenue data, or technical details, and includes irrelevant tags (e.g., 'construction'). While the project URL points to a functional Digital ID toolkit, the evaluation is severely penalized by the low-quality, exaggerated, and unverifiable assertions provided in the input.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline