The submission contains severe contradictions and red flags indicating a spam or low-quality entry. The URL points to a Masonic Hall in the UK, while the description plagiarizes text from a Nashville-based AI Meetup group. The traction claim ('most people have used my product') is factually incorrect and hyperbolic. The revenue field contains nonsensical data ('marketcap'). Due to the complete mismatch between the project identity and the submitted details, the Proof of Usefulness is effectively zero.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline