The submission for 'Vorx' lacks credible evidence and contains hyperbolic claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product') that undermine its validity. The description is generic to the point of being non-descriptive, and critical metrics like revenue and active users are missing or nonsensical ('all time marketcap: null'). While the team size is listed as 21-40, there is no verifiable data provided to support the reach or impact of the project. The target audience of 'everyone' suggests a lack of market focus. The project appears to be a standard service agency with a low-effort submission.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline