The submission for 'Visidoo' lists 'visidoo.de' (a domain with no current content) but external search reveals a verifiable project 'Visidoo.cz', a real estate watchdog in the Czech Republic with approximately 24,000 users. While the underlying project has genuine utility and regional traction, the submission itself is of extremely poor quality, containing hyperbolic claims ('most people have used my product'), incorrect categorization ('Management Consulting' as technology), and empty fields. The score reflects the existence of the actual product (preventing a negative score) but is heavily penalized for the lack of provided evidence and low-quality input.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline