The submission for 'Virtual Bug' presents significant red flags, including hyperbolic claims of traction ('most people have used my product') that contradict the team size of 6 and lack of verifiable metrics. The description lists a broad array of buzzwords (AR/VR, IoT, Robotics) without evidence of specialization or a specific product, suggesting a generic service agency rather than a scalable technology venture. The financial metric labeled 'marketcap' is ambiguous and likely inaccurate. Due to the lack of concrete evidence, contradictory information, and poor submission quality, the project scores very low on the Proof of Usefulness scale.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline