The submission presents a graphic design subscription service but lacks verifiable data and credibility. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is hyperbolic and statistically incorrect. The confusion between 'marketcap' and revenue, along with the project name mismatch ('DeepStorm' vs 'Vidal Campi Estudio'), suggests a low-effort or unserious submission. No evidence of technical innovation or significant market reach is provided.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline