The submission contains critical inconsistencies, conflating two distinct entities: 'Vercity' (a UK-based asset management firm, vercity.com) and 'Exaltica' (an Indian training and placement institute described in the text). The URL belongs to the former, while the description belongs to the latter. Furthermore, the traction claim 'most people have used my product' is verifiable false and indicative of a low-quality or automated submission. Due to these red flags and the incoherence of the data, the project receives a near-zero score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline