The submission for Velm Ventures describes a dermatology-focused venture studio but lacks any verifiable digital footprint or evidence of operation. The submission contains significant red flags, including the claim that 'most people have used my product' (which is statistically impossible for a new venture studio) and the misuse of financial terminology ('all time marketcap: 500000' in the revenue field). With no website indexed and incoherent inputs, the project currently demonstrates negligible proof of usefulness.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline