The submission describes 'VandenHoek Masterplanners', a legitimate Dutch urban planning firm with verifiable high-profile government projects (e.g., Flora Campus Westland, Utrecht Lunetten). However, the submission quality is critically low, containing copy-paste errors (project name 'WhisperKeeper'), nonsensical financial terms ('marketcap' for a private service firm), and blatantly false traction claims ('most people have used my product'). While the real-world utility and verified B2B traction are strong, the project is a professional service consultancy, not a scalable technology product, and the poor submission quality heavily penalizes the final score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline