The submission describes a local web design service but suffers heavily from low-quality, hyperbolic input data. Claims such as 'most people have used my product' and listing 'Internet' as the sole technology undermine credibility. Contradictions between the freelance description ('I specialise') and the stated team size (6) further suggest inaccurate reporting. While the underlying service (web design) has utility, the lack of verifiable traction and poor submission quality result in a minimal score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline