The project 'Valueance' presents itself as an IT services provider but fails to provide verifiable evidence of traction or utility. The submission is heavily penalized for hyperbolic claims (audience: 'everyone', traction: 'most people have used my product') which contradict the lack of verifiable data. The revenue metric ('marketcap 500000') is ambiguous (unknown currency/unit) and likely conflated. While the company appears to be a legitimate small consultancy established in 2017, the submission quality is extremely poor, relying on generic corporate buzzwords without specific technical details or case studies.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline