The submission identifies a valid problem space (Pharma/MedTech compliance) but fails to provide credible evidence of utility or traction. Critical red flags include the claim that 'most people have used my product' for a niche B2B tool and identifying the audience as 'everyone.' The description mentions AI, but the technology section lists only 'Management Consulting,' suggesting a lack of proprietary software. With no verifiable digital footprint and contradictory input data, the project scores significantly below the calibration baseline.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline