The submission lacks credible data and contains unrealistic claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product' and audience reach of 'everyone'). The description suggests a GRC (Governance, Risk, and Compliance) focus, but no specific problem or solution is detailed. The response quality is extremely low, with missing metrics and vague technical details, making it impossible to verify any traction or utility.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline