The submission describes an investment firm rather than a technology product. While the entity 'Valiance Asset Management' appears to exist, the submission contains significant red flags and low-quality data. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is factually incorrect for a specialized B2B asset management firm. The audience reach is listed as 'everyone', which is unrealistic. Additionally, no specific technology stack is provided ('Investment Management' is a sector, not a technology). The mismatch between the claimed team size (125) and the 'market cap' (17M) suggests data inconsistency. The PoU score is heavily penalized for lack of verifiable traction, unrealistic claims, and low response quality.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline