The project 'Urban' (urban.co) is a legitimate, established on-demand wellness platform in the UK and France with significant real-world utility and verifiable historical traction (650k+ treatments). However, the submission contains severe data integrity issues: it conflates the UK entity with the Indian unicorn 'Urban Company' (claiming a $3B market cap and 40,000+ team size, which are false for urban.co). The 'Audience Reach' and 'Evidence of Traction' scores are heavily penalized due to these misleading inputs and the user's vague claims ('everyone', 'most people'). Despite the high utility of the actual service, the Proof of Usefulness is constrained by the low quality and inaccuracy of the submitted metadata.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline