The submission contains significant data quality issues and contradictions (e.g., describing the industry as 'Banking Tech' while the business type is 'Educational Software'). The claim that 'most people have used my product' is unverifiable and highly likely exaggerated given the lack of public recognition for 'SwiftStorm' or 'upswing.one'. The submission lacks specific technical details, revenue data, or verifiable evidence of traction, resulting in a near-zero score reflecting a high probability of being a test or low-effort entry.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline