The submission for 'UpperWine' contains significant red flags and verifiable inaccuracies. The claim that 'most people have used my product' is objectively false for a niche wine retailer. The launch date of 1825 is impossible for a web-based platform, likely referring to a brand heritage or a typo, but undermines the technical timeline. The provided URL (upperwine.com) lacks a significant digital footprint compared to the submitter's claims. The technical description is empty ('consumer-goods' is not a technology). Due to the lack of evidence, hyperbolic claims, and low response quality, the project receives a near-zero score indicating a failed or spam submission.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline