The submission describes a legitimate research laboratory at Università Telematica Leonardo Da Vinci focusing on digital transition and the EU AI Act. However, the submission quality is critically low, containing demonstrably false or nonsensical claims in key metric fields. Specifically, the claim that 'most people have used my product' is invalid for a specialized academic lab, and the revenue field cites a 'marketcap' of 50,000, suggesting a misunderstanding of terms or a low-effort entry. While the subject matter (AI regulation) is timely, the lack of a concrete product, unverifiable traction, and poor response quality result in a negligible score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline