The submission references a highly established entity (Uniswap Foundation) with verified real-world utility and massive ecosystem impact. However, the submission content is of extremely low quality, featuring vague claims ('everyone'), unprofessional answers ('most people have used my product'), and ambiguous metrics ('all time marketcap: 2500000'). While the project itself is top-tier, the Proof of Usefulness relies on the evidence provided, which in this case is minimal and borderline spam-like, resulting in a significantly penalized score.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline