The submission contains significant contradictions that undermine credibility. While the URL (unbiased.co.uk) belongs to a mature financial services platform (founded ~2009), the description outlines a 'mission-driven' hiring/HR tech MVP currently under construction. The traction claim ('most people have used my product') is hyperbolic and unverifiable for an MVP. It appears the submitter has conflated a new project concept with an existing, unrelated high-traffic domain, or is misrepresenting the existing business. Due to these discrepancies, the project lacks verifiable utility or traction in its described form.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline