While ULTRA.VC is a verifiable early-stage venture capital firm based in Cyprus with a portfolio of ~30 startups, the submission itself is of extremely low quality and likely spam or a test. The input claims 'most people have used my product' (demonstrably false for a niche B2B fund) and lists a team size of 125, which contradicts public data showing a small team of ~10-15. The revenue field contains nonsensical data ('marketcap: 2500000'). The score reflects the existence of the entity but is heavily penalized for false claims, lack of specific traction evidence in the submission, and poor response quality.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline