The project represents a humanitarian aid initiative with high theoretical utility but suffers from a low-quality submission. The claim 'most people have used my product' is unverifiable and likely false, severely impacting the traction score. There is no evidence of custom technical innovation, and the project appears to be a standard informational website rather than a technology platform. The submission lacks critical data on revenue and active users.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline