The project represents a legitimate and highly valuable UK government-funded research institute (RISE) focused on hardware security. However, the submission itself is of extremely low quality, containing factually incorrect claims (e.g., 'most people have used my product', 'marketcap' instead of funding) and vague details. The score reflects the high intrinsic utility and timing of the entity, severely penalized by the lack of credible evidence and the unprofessional nature of the submission.
Ready to Compete for $150k+ in Prizes?
Move this data into a HackerNoon blog draft to become eligible for your share of $150k+ in cash and software prizes
Score Breakdown
Project Details
Algorithm Insights
Recommendations to Increase Usefulness Score
Document User Growth
Provide specific metrics on user acquisition and retention rates
Showcase Revenue Model
Detail sustainable monetization strategy and current revenue streams
Expand Evidence Base
Include testimonials, case studies, and third-party validation
Technical Roadmap
Share development milestones and feature completion timeline